Mangrove Conservation Policies in the Gulf of Guayaquil
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the last decade, the Ecuadorian government has designed and implemented a set of policies to improve mangrove forests conditions and their ability to provide ecosystem services. The present work aims to identify and explain current policies related to mangrove conservation in the Gulf of Guayaquil, which is a coastal region hosting more than 70% of Ecuador´s mangroves. The main assumption underlying this effort is the notion that mangrove conservation might be critically linked to subjective measures; these measures would better the welfare for populations that live in this ecosystem and depend on it. Based on the evidence of recent studies an institutional economic analysis was conducted; this analysis used the Situation, Structure and Performance framework. Results support the original assumption. Challenges were also identified for the continuity of current policies and new urgent needs for future research.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
INVESTIGATIO es de acceso abierto y el contenido está disponible de manera gratuita a través de su sitio web: http://revistas.uees.edu.ec/index.php/IRR/.
Para reforzar nuestra política de acceso abierto, la revista INVESTIGATIO se publica bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC 4.0), la cual permite compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material), bajo la condición de que se den los créditos correspondientes y no se haga uso comercial de los materiales.
References
Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Decentralization and Community-Based Forestry: Learning from Experience. In Decentralization, Forests and Rural Communities: Policy Outcomes in South and Southeast Asia. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Alava, J., & Haase, B. (2011). Waterbird biodiversity and conservation threats in Coastal Ecuador and the Galapagos Islands. In O. Grillo & G. Venora (Eds.), Ecosystems biodiversity. Rijeka.
Alvarez-Mieles, G., Irvine, K., Griensven, A. V., Arias-Hidalgo, M., Torres, A., & Mynett, A. E. (2013). Relationships between aquatic biotic communities and water quality in a tropical river–wetland system (Ecuador). Environmental Science and Policy, 34, 115–127.
Andersson, K., & Gibson, C. C. (2007). Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 99-123 doi.org/10.1002/pam.20229
Barbier, E. B. (2003). The Role of Natural Resources in Economic Development. Australian Economic Papers, 42(2), 253–272.
Beitl, C. M. (2014). Navigating Over Space and Time: Fishing Effort Allocation and the Development of Customary Norms in an Open-Access Mangrove Estuary in Ecuador. Human Ecology, 42(3), 395–411.
Beitl, C. M. (2017). Decentralized mangrove conservation and territorial use rights in Ecuador’s mangrove-associated fisheries. Bulletin of Marine Science, 93(1), 117-136
Bravo Cedeño, M. (2010). Interpretación del estudio multitemporal (CLIRSEN 1969-2006) de las coberturas de manglar, camaroneras y áreas salinas en la franja costera de Ecuador continental. Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil.
Brockington, D., & Wilkie, D. (2015). Protected areas and poverty. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370: 20140271 doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0271
Chhatre, A., & Agrawal, A. (2009). Trade-Offs and Synergies between Carbon Storage and Livelihood Benefits from Forest Commons. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 106, pp. 17667–17670).
CI. (2016a). GEF-6 Project Identification Form: Implementation of the strategic plan of Ecuador’s Mainland Marine and Coastal Protected Areas Network.
CI. (2016b). Improving mangrove conservation across the Eastern Tropical Pacific Seascape (ETPS) through coordinated regional and national strategy development and implementation.
Coello, S; Vinueza, D; Alemán, R. (2008). Evaluación del desempeño de los acuerdos de uso sustentable y custodia de manglar de la zona costera del Ecuador. MAE, 1–55.
Cruz, M., Gabor, N., Mora, E., Jiménez, R., & Mair, J. (2003). The known and unknown about marine biodiversity in Ecuador (Continental e Insular). Revista Gayana, 67(2), 232–260.
Herrera, P., Calles, A., Pozo, M., Villa-Cox, G., Ortega-Pacheco, D., & Coronel, J. (2017). Políticas públicas de conservación de los manglares y bienestar de pescadores y recolectores en el Golfo de Guayaquil. Guayaquil.
Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 213–239.
López-Rodríguez, F., Benítez, A., & Jurrius, I. (2019). Efectividad de Manejo de Acuerdos de Uso Sustentable y Custodia de Manglar en la provincia de El Oro. Martha Molina Moreira (Comp.) Primer Congreso Manglares de América, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Miteva, D. A., Pattanayak, S. K., & Ferraro, P. J. (2012). Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn’t? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(1), 69–92. doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs009
Montaño, M., & Robadue, D. (1995). Monitoreo y manejo de la calidad del agua costera. In M. Ochoa (Ed.), Manejo Costero integrado en Ecuador. Guayaquil: Programa de Manejo de Recursos Costeros.
Moreno-Sánchez, R., Maldonado, J., Campoverde, D., Solís, C., Gutiérrez, C., & Bruner, A. (2015). Insumos técnicos para fortalecer las concesiones de manglar en Ecuador a través de Socio Bosque: combinando técnicas de valoración económica y juegos experimentales (Serie Técnica No. 40).
Phelps, J. W., Webb, E. L., & Agrawal, A. (2010). Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science, 328(5976), 312–313.
Schmid, A. (2004). Methods. In Conflict and Cooperation (pp. 138–162). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Twilley, R., Cárdenas, W., Rivera-Monroy, V., Espinoza, J., Suescum, R., Armijos, M., & Solórzano, L. (2001). The Gulf of Guayaquil and the Guayas River Estuary, Ecuador. In U. Seeliger & B. Kjerfve (Eds.), Coastal Marine Ecosystems of Latin America (Vol. 144). Berlin: Springer.
Wells, M. P. (1998). Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity & Conservation, 7(6), 815–835.
Wever, L., Glaser, M., Gorris, P., & Ferrol-Schulte, D. (2012). Decentralization and participation in integrated coastal management: Policy lessons from Brazil and Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 66, 63–72.
Wright, G. D., Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Evans, T. P. (2016). Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(52), 14958–14963.